Contact: Gwen Gampel
(202) 544-6264
"At a minimum
Medicare reimbursement for dialysis treatments should be increased by
2.9% in 2002 to cover inflationary costs," according to Abt Associates
which conducted a detailed analysis of dialysis provider costs and Medicare
revenue for 1999 and 2000. The study entitled, "Updating the 2002
composite Rate for Dialysis Treatments", concluded that, "without
an adjustment to the composite rate, patient access to care in areas
with above average proportions of Medicare patients will be threatened."
Medicare currently
provides "composite rate" reimbursement to some 3,600 free-standing
and hospital-based dialysis facilities providing renal replacement therapy
to approximately 300,000 Medicare beneficiaries with End-Stage Renal
Disease (ESRD) throughout the U.S. Without kidney transplantation or
dialysis treatments, to clean the blood of toxins, ESRD is invariably
fatal.
Kent Thiry, CEO
of DaVita, and Chairman of the Renal Leadership Council said, "Dialysis
providers welcome the results of the study as it clearly demonstrates
that dialysis facilities require an inflation increase for 2002 from
Medicare." Thiry went on to say that, "The Renal Leadership
Council was extremely frustrated by this year's Medicare Payment Advisory
Commission's flawed assessment that Medicare reimbursement for dialysis
treatments should remain unchanged". However, he said, "He
understood that MedPAC decided to conduct a broader analysis than they
usually do and staff simply did not have enough time or have access
to some key data to do as thorough an analysis as Abt Associates."
Thiry said, "Like
other health care services, dialysis facilities are facing labor shortages,
rising wages, fuel costs and product costs. Facilities must receive
adequate reimbursement to continue providing Medicare beneficiaries
the quality of care they deserve."
"Dialysis provider
reimbursement is the only Medicare reimbursement that does not include
an annual update formula," Thiry said. "As a result, Thiry
continued, "while hospitals are slated to receive a 2.75% increase
and other providers will receive on average 2.5% increases in their
Medicare reimbursement in 2002, dialysis providers will receive no increase
without Congressional action this year."
Abt Associates'
findings contradict the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission's (MedPAC)
analyses and recommendation. Specifically, while MedPAC considered all
of the Medicare revenue from the composite rate and separately billable
drugs, the Abt report found the commission did not take into consideration
the most recent increases in labor, capital, drug acquisition, and overhead
costs of providing dialysis treatments and ancillary drugs. This combined
with the fact that the commission omitted from their analysis legitimate
costs related to bad debt and medical directors fees led them to the
wrong conclusion about dialysis providers' margins.
Abt concluded that:
- Even restricting
the analysis to allowable Medicare costs, in 2000, the cost of providing
composite rate services exceeded the average Medicare composite rate
payment by almost $8.00 a treatment, a 7% shortfall. (The average
composite rate payment per treatment is $128.)
- Contrary to MedPAC's
findings, the profits made on separately billable items were not large
enough to cover the increasing losses incurred on composite rate services.
- While the number
of patients treated by the largest dialysis companies has increased
in recent years, this type of consolidation actually indicates falling
profit margins, not increased profits as MedPAC assumes.
- Productivity
changes are unlikely to affect provider costs in 2002, contrary to
MedPAC's unsubstantiated projection of further productivity gains.
In summary, Abt
concluded, "Failure to increase Medicare reimbursement to dialysis
facilities to cover annual inflationary costs may make it difficult
for dialysis providers to continue to maintain or improve the quality
of dialysis services. Further, inadequate Medicare reimbursement may
threaten patient access to care, particularly in small rural or urban
facilities that have above average costs."
The Abt Associates study is based on the most current, actual data from
the six largest providers of dialysis services and several smaller providers
which together deliver nearly 70% of all the dialysis care for Medicare
ESRD beneficiaries in this country. The study was commissioned by some
of the leading renal community organizations including the Renal Leadership
Council, which includes 4 of the largest dialysis providers, Fresenius
Medical Care, the National Kidney Foundation, the National Renal Administrators
Association and the American Nephrology Nurses' Association.